Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genome sequence of Epibacterium ulvae strain DSM 24752T, an indigoidine-producing, macroalga-associated member of the marine Roseobacter group

Environmental Microbiome volume 14, Article number: 4 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Strain U95T (= DSM 24752T = LMG 26464T) is the type strain of Epibacterium ulvae, which is the type species of the genus Epibacterium. This genus belongs to the marine Roseobacter group. E. ulvae Strain U95T was isolated from the macroalga Ulva australis, is Gram-negative, rod-shaped and motile. Here we describe the permanent draft genome sequence and annotation of E. ulvae U95T with a focus on secondary metabolite production and interaction with its host. The genome contains 4,092,893 bp, 3977 protein-coding genes and 60 RNA genes. The genome encodes a gene cluster for synthesis of the blue-pigmented secondary metabolite indigoidine and contains several genes for adhesion mechanisms, putative bacteriocin, siderophores, a type VI secretion system, and enzymes that confer oxidative stress resistance. Combined, these features may aid in the successful colonization and persistence of E. ulvae on host surfaces and in competition with the surrounding microbial consortium.

Introduction

The genus Epibacterium was proposed by Penesyan et al., [41] and belongs to the family Rhodobacteraceae within the class Alphaproteobacteria. Currently, the genus comprises two closely related strains (U82 and U95T) which both belong to the species Epibacterium ulvae. The name refers to the source of isolation of the strains, the surface of the alga Ulva australis. The type strain Epibacterium ulvae U95T is a motile, rod-shaped bacterium, which is oxidase and catalase positive and known to produce a so far uncharacterised antibacterial compound. E. ulvae belongs to the Roseobacter group which is ubiquitous in the marine environment and can account for up to 25% of the total marine bacterial community, e.g. in coastal sea-water [58]. To date, the majority of characterized Roseobacter strains have been isolated from seawater, however, an increasing number of Roseobacter group organisms are found in association with eukaryotic organisms, such as macroalgae [12, 44, 54], phytoplankton [4, 28] and marine invertebrates [6, 9, 15], where they can establish both beneficial [27, 57] and pathogenic relationships [30, 51].

The production of various secondary metabolites has been described for several Rhodobacteraceae, e.g. tropodithietic acid (TDA) [10], roseobacticides [52] and indigoidine [16, 20]. Several Roseobacter group members are photoheterotrophs using light to generate ATP via aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis, have the ability to oxidise carbon monoxide [36, 56] or play an important role in the marine sulphur cycle [29].

Here we present the draft genome of the E. ulvae type strain U95T focussing on genes involved in secondary metabolism and host association. The aim of this study is to aid the identification and characterization of potentially novel biologically active metabolites and to gain a deeper understanding of the adaptive features of this member of the Roseobacter group.

Material and methods

Growth conditions, genomic DNA isolation and phenotypic assays

Epibacterium ulvae U95T was obtained from the surface of the marine alga Ulva australis, collected at Sharks Point, Clovelly, a rocky intertidal zone on the east coast of Sydney, Australia [41]. General features of E. ulvae U95T are reported in Additional file 1: Table S1. E. ulvae U95T was grown in Difco™ Marine Broth 2216 (MB) and incubated at 25 °C for approx. 18 h with agitation at 150 rpm on an orbital shaker (Ratek, Australia). Genomic DNA was extracted using the XS DNA extraction protocol [55]. Cell morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 1). The ability of E. ulvae U95T to form biofilms was performed using a 96 well polystyrene microtiter plate assay [33, 39]. Purification and analysis of indigoidine was examined using the previously described method by [16], but with Marine Broth agar plates instead of YTSS agar plates. The secretion of iron-scavenging siderophores was tested using the Chrome Azurol S (CAS) liquid assay [2, 49].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Scanning electron micrograph of Epibacterium ulvae U95T showing the characteristic variations in cell morphology

Full size image

Genome sequencing, assembly and annotation

The genome was sequenced on the Illumina sequencing platform both at the Joint Genome Institute and the Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics (UNSW). Reads were assembled using the Spades assembler [7] and the assembly was checked for potential contamination by blastn against the nucleotide (nt) database, respectively [3]. The genome assembly was annotated using the IMG platform [34]. All sequencing project information is reported in Additional file 1: Table S2. A phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences from E. ulvae U95T and closely related strains was calculated using the Neighbour Joining method and the maximum likelihood method in ARB [32] with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Only sequences with more than 1265 bp were considered in the calculations.

Results and discussion

E. ulvae U95T was chosen for genome sequencing to aid in the characterization of potentially novel biologically active metabolites and to gain a deeper understanding of the adaptive features of this member of the Roseobacter group. The complete genome sequence has been deposited at NCBI (GenBank accession number PHJF00000000) and Integrated Microbial Genome (IMG) (Genome ID 2747842406).

The draft genome consists of 25 contigs containing 4,092,893 bp and a content of 52.95% G + C. Of the 4,037 total genes 3,977 are protein-coding genes and 60 are RNA genes (47 tRNA and 3 RNA genes, 10 other). 79.76% of the protein coding genes are assigned to functions, 18.75% remained as hypothetical proteins Table 1. COG functional categories are shown in Table 2. A pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed, that U95T contains at least eight plasmids [41], but this could not be assigned in the genome sequence due to its draft status.

Table 1 Genome statistics
Full size table
Table 2 Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories
Full size table

On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the genus Epibacterium represents a separate branch within the class Alphaproteobacteria. A blastn search of the 16S rRNA gene against the GenBank database revealed that U95T is closely related to members of the genera Tropicibacter, Thalassobius, Sulfitobacter and Shimia. A phylogenetic tree calculated using the Neighbour Joining method and the Maximum Likelihood method supported this finding. Interestingly, Tropicibacter litoreus and Tropicibacter mediterraneus cluster together with the genus Epibacterium and not with other members of the genus Tropicibacter (Fig. 2). The blastn search also revealed that U95T is 99% identical over 1324 bp (99% total length) to strain Ruegeria sp. AU529 (Acc # LN878403) which also clusters with Epibacterium ulvae U82 and U95T. Strain AU529 was isolated from the marine sponge Cymbastela concentrica, sampled in Botany Bay, NSW, Australia [21], which is in close distance to Sharks Point from where U95T was isolated.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Epibacterium ulvae U95T relative to the type species of the neighboring genera Tropicibacter, Thalassobius, Sulfitobacter and Shimia. The tree was calculated using the Neighbour Joining method in ARB [32] with 1000 bootstrap replicates; only values > 50% are shown at major nodes. Filled circles indicate nodes also recovered reproducibly with the maximum likelihood method. Bar equals 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position. Only sequences with more than 1265 bp were considered in the calculations

Full size image

Genomic features related to pigment and siderophore production

Genome analysis of E. ulvae U95T revealed a cluster of genes responsible for the production of indigoidine. Indigoidine (5,5′-diamino-4,4′-dihydroxy-3,3′- diazadiphenoquinone-(2,2′) is a natural, water-insoluble blue pigment synthesized through the condensation of two units of L-glutamine by a 4′-phosphopantetheinyl transferase (PPTase) non-ribosomal peptide synthases (NRPS) module. Homologs of this gene are found in a number of environmental bacteria for example, IndC/ IdgC from Dickeya dadantii (Erwinia chrysanthemi) [13], IndC from Streptomyces aureofaciens CCM 3239 [37], IbpA from Streptomyces lavendulae [40] and IgiD from Rhodobacterales sp. Y4I (previously Phaeobacter sp., Y41) [16]. Indigoidine is considered as a powerful radical scavenger enabling phytopathogens to combat oxidative stress, organic peroxides and superoxides during the plant defence response [46]. The blue pigment has also been shown to possess antimicrobial activity [16]. Chemical extraction of E. ulvae U95T resulted in a blue colored solution. Subsequent High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry (HPLC/MS) analysis identified peaks corresponding to indigoidine (Additional file 1: Figure S3). U95T was previously shown to have antimicrobial activity through production of a yet uncharacterized compound [42]. Using a heterologous gene expression approach an E. coli clone containing a fosmid with a genomic insert from strain U95T was shown to harbour the indigoidine gene cluster (fosmid 19F10, GenBank accession number JX523956). This clone also displayed potent antibacterial and antinematodal (Caenorhabditis elegans) activity [42]. Our current analysis of the genome and the pigment suggests that this antimicrobial activity may be attributed to indigoidine. Based on comparative analysis to the indigoidine gene clusters from other bacteria (Additional file 1: Table S3) we propose that the putative indigoidine gene cluster of U95T includes the genes Ga0207336_104203 to Ga0207336_104208 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Indigoidine gene cluster in Epibacterium ulvae U95T. The genes shown are located at the locus tags Ga0207336_104202 - Ga0207336_104209. Additional information regarding gene homology to other indigoidine producing organisms can be found in Additional file 1: Table S3

Full size image

The genome of E. ulvae U95T also encodes a cluster for biosynthesis and transport of a putative iron-chelating siderophore (Ga0207336_10111, Ga0207336_10110, Ga0207336_1019, Ga0207336_1018, Ga0207336_1017and Ga0207336_10120 – Ga0207336_10117, respectively). Siderophores are small organic molecules (approximately 200–2000 Da) produced by some microorganisms under iron-limiting conditions that in turn sequester iron from different sources [48]. Iron (Fe) is an essential element for growth of almost all living microorganisms. It plays an important role in several metabolic processes, including the tricarboxylic acid cycle, electron transport chain, oxidative phosphorylation and detoxification of reactive oxygen species (e.g., catalases, super-oxidase dismutase) [1]. The organisation of the biosynthesis gene cluster in U95T is identical to the siderophore gene cluster found in Phaeobacter inhibens DSM 17395 and 2.10, which is hypothesized to be petrobactin-like [54]. Sterile filtrated supernatant from culture of E. ulvae U95T growing under iron depleted conditions showed CAS activity, indicating the excretion of siderophores. The negative control, Roseobacter denitrificans DSM 7001, which lacks the gene cluster, showed no evidence of siderophore production (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

E. ulvae U95T contains four additional genes within the siderophore cluster that are absent in other Phaeobacter spp. but are found in some roseobacters isolated from the accessory nidamental gland of Euprymna scolopes [14] (Fig. 4). These additional four genes, encoding an arginine decarboxylase, a carboxynorspermidine dehydrogenase, a carboxynorspermidine decarboxylase and an agmatinase likely encode for the production of spermidine. Thus, these proteins could be involved in the synthesis of the polyamine backbone of the siderophore. Polyamines such as putrescine, spermidine and norspermidine are the backbone of siderophores putrebactin, petrobactin [8] and vulnibactin [38] respectively.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Gene cluster for siderophore production and transport in Epibacterium ulvae U95T, Phaeobacter gallaeciensis DSM 17395 and Phaeobacter gallaeciensis 2.10. Grey boxes show conserved gene orders. Note that the genes for the iron complex transport system are inverted in Phaeobacter spp. The genes shown are located on the locus tags (from left to right) Ga0207336_1017 - Ga0207336_10124 in E. ulvae U95T

Full size image

Genomic features related to surface colonization and biofilm formation

Chemotaxis can be used by motile bacterial cells, e.g. to sense and swim towards metabolites suitable for growth or to avoid toxic substances. The ability for an organism to use chemotaxis can provide a competitive advantage in natural environment [19, 61]. E. ulvae U95T has genes for several chemotaxis receptors as well as signal transducers (Additional file 1: Table S4), suggesting that this strain is responsive to a wide variety of stimuli, including, for example, nutrients, growth conditions, changes in osmolarity, quorum signals, and antibiotics.

The genome of E. ulvae U95T encodes for several extracellular components and surface appendages likely involved in surface colonization and biofilm formation. These include genes encoding for flagellar assembly, surface lipoproteins, capsular polysaccharide (O-antigen) and Flp pilli (Additional file 1: Table S5). In most natural environments, biofilms are the prevailing lifestyle of bacteria. Bacterial biofilms consist of cells adhered to a solid surface and encased in an extracellular polymeric matrix [24]. To effectively attach and colonise a surface, bacteria make use of different adhesion factors including surface proteins [47], curli, fimbriae, pili [17, 35] and flagella [60] in addition to the production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). We assessed the ability of E. ulvae U95T to form biofilms using a 96 well polystyrene microtiter plate assay [33, 39]. These biofilm formation experiments revealed that E. ulvae is able to form a dense biofilm on polystyrene and after 72 h it was as effective in biofilm formation as other tested strains of the Roseobacter group (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Genomic features related to stress response and defence mechanism

All bacteria have an inherent tendency to sense and respond to changing environmental conditions. The genome of U95T encodes several multidrug efflux pumps and drug resistance proteins (Additional file 1: Table S6) as well as permeases of the drug/ metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily (Additional file 1: Table S7) that can provide additional protective benefit to U95T against antibiotics and toxins secreted by competing microorganism. U95T was shown to be resistant to the aminoglycoside antibiotics gentamicin and spectinomycin [41]. We found genes belonging to the aminoglycoside-phosphotransferase family (Locus: Ga0207336_105156; Ga0207336_110112, Predicted kinase, aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (APT) family; ATP-dependent O-phosphorylation by phosphotransferases (APH); pfam01636), which are known to be responsible for resistance to aminoglycosides in other bacteria and likely to provide U95T with resistance to these antibiotics.

Macroalgae and other photosynthetic organisms use reactive oxygen species (ROS) as a means to protect themselves against incoming colonizing microorganisms or pathogenic attacks [59]. Genome analysis of E. ulvae U95T revealed the presence of genes for a catalase-peroxidase (Ga0207336_104247) and a superoxide dismutase (Ga0207336_102167, Ga0207336_101691) that may provide a defence mechanism against the oxidising environment associated with the macroalgal surface.

Interestingly, the genome also encodes for several genes with homology to those involved in detoxification, including an uncharacterised protein associated with tellurium resistance (YaaN, Ga0207336_102395), quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein (SugE, Ga0207336_104105), and czcA/czcB (Ga0207336_11334, Ga0207336_11335) for resistance to cobalt, zinc and cadmium [5, 25, 43, 53]. While the precise role for these genes in E. ulvae U95T is not known, heavy metal resistance has been described to occur in some sponge associated bacteria [50] as well as in bacteria isolated from marine habitats [18]. Therefore, the presence of these genes in U95T might provide the bacterium with protection against various contaminations and xenobiotics found in the marine ecosystem, which can be particularly high in urbanised coastal regions [11].

Genomic features related to sulfur cycling

The genome of E. ulvae U95T contains genes for a dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) reductase (Ga0207336_10987), a periplasmic dimethylsulfoxide reductase YedY (Ga0207336_105258) and a trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) reductase YedZ (Ga0207336_105259), suggesting this bacterium may play a role in dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) degradation and DMSO conversion. Bacteria of the Roseobacter group are generally involved in the transformation of DMSP by demethylation or via the cleavage pathway [31] and thus play an important role in the marine sulphur cycle.

Genomic features related to protein secretion systems

Protein secretion systems play a major role in modulating various bacterial interactions (biofilms and mutualistic or pathogenic associations) within their environments. The genome of U95Tencodes for the full set of genes for a type III secretion system (T3SS), type IV secretion system (T4SS) and type VI secretion system (T6SS) (Additional file 1: Table S8). T4SSs can be found in almost all bacterial species where they play an important role in the transportation of monomeric and multimeric proteins (toxins and nucleoprotein complexes) as well as DNA across the bacterial cell envelope [45]. The T3SS and T6SS secretion mechanisms are thought to play an important role in both pathogenic and bacterial-host symbioses where they function to transport a variety of substrates (proteins, toxins and enzymes) directly into host cells via a needle-like structure ([26, 62]). The potential for E. ulvae U95T to utilize a variety of secretion mechanisms may thus represent an important mechanism of host adaptation in this epiphytic bacterium.

Conclusions

The genome of E. ulvae U95T revealed several characteristics that are potentially beneficial for its persistence and survival on host surfaces. As discussed above several adhesins including curli, fimbrae and pilli may allow this bacterium to interact with a variety of hosts including algae and sponges. Genes encoding for production of toxins, bacteriocins, antimicrobials, capsule polysaccharides and siderophores were identified and these could provide additional protective benefit towards competing microbiota in environmentally stressful conditions. This study represents the first genome description of a member of the Epibacterium genus and may guide future research aimed at characterizing the role of specific genes and pathways involved marine host-microbe interactions.

Abbreviations

CAS:

Chrome Azurol S

DMSO:

dimethylsulfoxide

DMSP:

dimethylsulfoniopropionate

EPS:

extracellular polymeric substances

IMG:

Integrated Microbial Genome

MB:

Marine Broth 2216

ROS:

reactive oxygen species

T3SS:

type III secretion system

T4SS:

type IV secretion system

T6SS:

type VI secretion system

TDA:

tropodithietic acid

References

  1. Aguado-Santacruz GAA, Moreno-Gómez BA, Jiménez-Francisco BB, García-Moya EB, Preciado-Ortiz RE. Impact of the microbial siderophores and phytosiderophores on the iron assimilation by plants: a synthesis. Rev Fitotec Mex. 2012;35(1):9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander DB, Zuberer DA. Use of chrome azurol S reagents to evaluate siderophore production by rhizosphere bacteria. Biol Fert Soils. 1991;12(1):39–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amin SA, Parker MS, Armbrust EV. Interactions between diatoms and bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2012;76(3):667–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Anantharaman V, Iyer LM, Aravind L. Ter-dependent stress response systems: novel pathways related to metal sensing, production of a nucleoside-like metabolite, and DNA-processing. Mol BioSyst. 2012;8(12):3142–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Apprill A, Marlow HQ, Martindale MQ, Rappe MS. The onset of microbial associations in the coral Pocillopora meandrina. ISME J. 2009;3(6):685–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bankevich A, Sergey N, Dmitry A, Alexey AG, Mikhail D, Alexender SK, Valery ML, Sergey IN, Son P, Andrey DP, Alexey VP, Alexender VS, Nikolay V, Glenn T, Max AA, Pavel AP. A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(5):455–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbeau K, Zhang G, Live DH, Butler A. Petrobactin, a photoreactive siderophore produced by the oil-degrading marine bacterium Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124(3):378–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker PT, Gillan DC, Eeckhaut I. Characterization of the bacterial community associated with body wall lesions of Tripneustes gratilla (Echinoidea) using culture-independent methods. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;100(2):127–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berger M, Neumann A, Schulz S, Simon M, Brinkhoff T. Tropodithietic acid production in Phaeobacter gallaeciensis is regulated by N-acyl homoserine lactone-mediated quorum sensing. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(23):6576–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Birch GF, Chang CH, Lee JH, Churchill LJ. The use of vintage surficial sediment data and sedimentary cores to determine past and future trends in estuarine metal contamination (Sydney estuary, Australia). Sci Total Environ. 2013;454–455:542–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Case RJ, Longford SR, Campbell AH, Low A, Tujula N, Steinberg PD, Kjelleberg S. Temperature induced bacterial virulence and bleaching disease in a chemically defended marine macroalga. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13(2):529–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chu MK, Lin LF, Twu CS, Lin RH, Lin YC, Hsu ST, Tzeng KC, Huang HC. Unique features of Erwinia chrysanthemi (Dickeya dadantii) RA3B genes involved in the blue indigoidine production. Microbiol Res. 2010;165:483–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Collins AJ, Fullmer MS, Gogarten JP, Nyholm SV. Comparative genomics of Roseobacter clade bacteria isolated from the accessory nidamental gland of Euprymna scolopes. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins AJ, LaBarre BA, Won BSW, Shah MV, Heng S, Choudhury MH, Hayder SA, Santiago J, Nyholm SV. Diversity and partitioning of bacterial populations within the accessory nidamental gland of the squid Euprymnascolopes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(12):4200–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cude WN, Mooney J, Tavanaei AA, Hadden MK, Frank AM, Gulvik CA, May AL, Buchan A. Production of the antimicrobial secondary metabolite indigoidine contributes to competitive surface colonization by the marine Roseobacter Phaeobacter sp. strain Y4I. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78(14):4771–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dalisay DS, Webb JS, Scheffel A, Svenson C, James S, Holmström C, Egan S, Kjelleberg S. A mannose-sensitive haemagglutinin (MSHA)-like pilus promotes attachment of Pseudoalteromonas tunicata cells to the surface of the green alga Ulva australis. Microbiology. 2006;152:2875–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De J, Ramaiah N, Vardanyan L. Detoxification of heavy metals by marine bacteria highly resistant to mercury. Mar Biotechnol. 2008;10(4):471–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DeLoney-Marino CR, Wolfe AJ, Visick KL. Chemoattraction of Vibrio fischeri to serine, nucleosides, and N-acetylneuraminic acid, a component of squid light-organ mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(12):7527–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dogs M, Teshima H, Petersen J, Fiebig A, Chertkov O, Dalingault H, Chen A, Pati A, Goodwin LA, Chain P, Detter JC, Ivanova N, Rhode M, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Simon M, Goker M, Klenk HP, Brinkhoff T. Genome sequence of Phaeobacter daeponensis type strain (DSM 23529T), a facultatively anaerobic bacterium isolated from marine sediment, and emendation of Phaeobacter daeponensis. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;9(1):142–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Esteves AIS, Amer N, Nguyen M, Thomas T. Sample processing impacts the viability and cultivability of the sponge microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:499.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, Ashburner M, Axelrod N, Baldauf S, Ballard S, Boore J, Cochrane G, Cole J, Dawyndt P, De Vos P, DePamphilis C, Edwards R, Faruque N, Feldman R, Gilbert J, Gilna P, Glöckner FO, Goldstein P, Guralnick R, Haft D, Hancock D, Hermjakob H, Hertz-Fowler C, Hugenholtz P, Joint I, Kagan L, Kane M, Kennedy J, Kowalchuk G, Kottmann R, Kolker E, Kravitz S, Kyrpides N, Leebens-Mack J, Lewis SE, Li K, Lister AL, Lord P, Maltsev N, Markowitz V, Martiny J, Methe B, Mizrachi I, Moxon R, Nelson K, Parkhill J, Proctor L, White O, Sansone SA, Spiers A, Stevens R, Swift P, Taylor C, Tateno Y, Tett A, Turner S, Ussery D, Vaughan B, Ward N, Whetzel T, San Gil I, Wilson G, Wipat A. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008; 26(5):541-7. https://0-www-nature-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/articles/nbt1360.

  23. Field D, Amaral-Zettler L, Cochrane G, Cole JR, Dawyndt P, Garrity GM, Gilbert J, Glöckner FO, Hirschman L, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Klenk H-P, Knight R, Kottmann R, Kyrpides N, Meyer F, Gil IS, Sansone S-A, Schriml LM, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Ussery DW, White O, Wooley J. The Genomic Standards Consortium. PLoS Biol 9(6): e1001088. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(9):623–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fong ST, Camakaris J, Lee BT. Molecular genetics of a chromosomal locus involved in copper tolerance in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1995;15(6):1127–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Galan JE, Wolf-Watz H. Protein delivery into eukaryotic cells by type III secretion machines. Nature. 2006;444(7119):567–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Geng H, Belas R. Molecular mechanisms underlying roseobacter phytoplankton symbioses. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010;21(3):332–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grossart HP, Levold F, Allgaier M, Simon M, Brinkhoff T. Marine diatom species harbour distinct bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7(6):860–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Howard E, Henriksen J, Buchan A, Reisch C, Burgmann H, Welsh R, Ye W, Gonzalez JM, Mace K, Joye SB, Kiene RP, Whitman WB, Moran MA. Bacterial taxa that limit sulfur flux from the ocean. Science. 2006;314(5799):649–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar V, Zozaya-Valdes E, Kjelleberg S, Thomas T, Egan S. Multiple opportunistic pathogens can cause a bleaching disease in the red seaweed Delisea pulchra. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(11):3962–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lenk S, Moraru C, Hahnke S, Arnds J, Richter M, Kube M, Reinhardt R, Brinkhoff T, Harder J, Amann R, Mubmann M. Roseobacter clade bacteria are abundant in coastal sediments and encode a novel combination of sulfur oxidation genes. ISME J. 2012;6(12):2178–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, Buchner A, Lai T, Steppi S, Jobb G, Förster W, Brettske I, Gerber S, Ginhart AW, Gross O, Grumann S, Hermann S, Jost R, König A, Liss T, Lüssmann R, May M, Nonhoff B, Reichel B, Strehlow R, Stamatakis A, Stuckmann N, Vilbig A, Lenke M, Ludwig T, Bode A, Schleifer KH. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(4):1363–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lutz C, Thomas T, Steinberg P, Kjelleberg S, Egan S. Effect of interspecific competition on trait variation in Phaeobacter inhibens biofilms. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(5):1635–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Markowitz VM, Chen IMA, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, Ratner A, Jacob B, Huang J, Williams P, Huntemann M, Anderson I, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Kyrpides NC. IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D115–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mattick JS. Type IV pili and twitching motility. Ann Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:289–314.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Moran MA, Buchan A, Gonzalez JM, Heidelberg JF, Whitman WB, Kiene RP, Henriksen JR, King GM, Belas R, Fuqua C, Brinkac L, Lewis M, Johri S, Weaver B, Pai G, Eisen JA, Rahe E, Sheldon WM, Ye W, Miller TR, Carlton J, Rasko DA, Paulsen IT, Ren Q, Daugherty SC, Deboy RT, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Madupu R, Nelson WC, Sullivan SA, Rosovitz MJ, Haft DH, Selengut J, Ward N. Genome sequencing of Silicibacter pomeroyi reveals adaptations to the marine environment. Nature. 2004;432(7019):910–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Novakova R, Odnogova Z, Kutas P, Feckova L, Kormanec J. Identification and characterization of an indigoidine-like gene for a blue pigment biosynthesis in Streptomyces aureofaciens CCM 3239. Folia Microbiol. 2010;55(2):119–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Okujo N, Saito M, Yamamoto S, Yoshida T, Miyoshi S, Shinoda S. Structure of vulnibactin, a new polyamine-containing siderophore from Vibrio vulnificus. Biometals. 1994;7(2):109–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. J Vis Exp. 2011;47:2437.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pait IGU, Kitani S, Kurniawan YN, Asa M, Iwai T, Ikeda H, Nihira T. Identification and characterization of lbpA, an indigoidine biosynthetic gene in the gamma-butyrolactone signaling system of Streptomyces lavendulae FRI-5J. Biosci Bioeng. 2017;124:369–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Penesyan A, Ballestriero F, Daim M, Kjelleberg S, Thomas T, Egan S. b. Assessing the effectiveness of functional genetic screens for the identification of bioactive metabolites. Mar. Drugs. 2013;11(1):40–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Penesyan A, Breider S, Schumann P, Tindall BJ, Egan S, Brinkhoff T. a. Epibacterium ulvae gen. Nov, sp. nov., epibiotic bacteria isolated from the surface of a marine alga. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:1589–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramaiah N, De J. Unusual rise in mercury-resistant bacteria in coastal environs. Microb Ecol. 2003;45(4):444–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rao D, Webb JS, Holmström C, Case R, Low A, Steinberg P, Kejelleberg S. Low densities of epiphytic bacteria from the marine alga Ulva australis inhibit settlement of fouling organisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(24):7844–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Rego AT, Chandran V, Waksman G. Two-step and one-step secretion mechanisms in gram-negative bacteria: contrasting the type IV secretion system and the chaperone-usher pathway of pilus biogenesis. Biochem J. 2010;425(3):475–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Reverchon S, Rouanet C, Expert D, Nasser W. Characterization of indigoidine biosynthetic genes in Erwinia chrysanthemi and role of this blue pigment in pathogenicity. J Bacteriol. 2002;184(3):654–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Russo TA, Luke NR, Beanan JM, Olson R, Sauberan SL, MacDonald U, Schultz LW, Umland TC, Campagnari AA. The K1 capsular polysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii strain 307-0294 is a major virulence factor. Infect Immun. 2010;78(9):3993–4000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Saha M, Sarkar S, Sarkar B, Sharma BK, Bhattacharjee S, Tribedi P. Microbial siderophores and their potential applications: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(5):3984–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Schwyn B, Neilands JB. Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem. 1987;160(1):47–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Selvin J, Priya SS, Kiran GS, Thangavelu T, Bai NS. Sponge-associated marine bacteria as indicators of heavy metal pollution. Microbiol Res. 2009;164(3):352–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Seyedsayamdost MR, Carr G, Kolter R, Clardy J. a. Roseobacticides: small molecule modulators of an algal-bacterial symbiosis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133(45):18343–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Seyedsayamdost MR, Case RJ, Kolter R, Clardy J. b. the Jekylland- Hyde chemistry of Phaeobacter gallaeciensis. Nat. Chem. 2011;3(4):331–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Silver S. Bacterial resistances to toxic metal ions-a review. Gene. 1996;179(1):9–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Thole S, Kalhoefer D, Voget S, Berger M, Engelhardt T, Liesegang H, Wollherr A, Kjelleberg S, Daniel R, Simon M, Thomas T, Brinkhoff T. Phaeobacter gallaeciensis genomes from globally opposite locations reveal high similarity of adaptation to surface life. ISME J. 2012;6(12):2229–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tillett D, Neilan DB. Xanthogenate nucleic acid isolation from cultured and environmental cyanobacteria. J Phycol. 2000;36(1):251–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Tolli JD, Sievert SM, Taylor CD. Unexpected diversity of bacteria capable of carbon monoxide oxidation in a coastal marine environment, and contribution of the roseobacter-associated clade to total CO oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(3):1966–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Wagner-Döbler I, Ballhausen B, Berger M, Brinkhoff T, Buchholz I, Bunk B, Cypionka H, Daniel R, Drepper T, Gerdts G, Hahnke S, Han C, Jahn D, Kalhoefer D, Kiss H, Klenk HP, Kyrpides N, Liebl W, Liesegang H, Meincke L, Pati A, Petersen J, Piekarski T, Pommerenke C, Pradella S, Pukall R, Rabus R, Stackebrandt E, Thole S, Thompson L, Tielen P, Tomasch J, von Jan M, Wanphrut N, Wichels A, Zech H, Simon M. The complete genome sequence of the algal symbiont Dinoroseobacter shibae: a hitchhiker’s guide to life in the sea. ISME J. 2010;4(1):61–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wagner-Döbler I, Biebl H. Environmental biology of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:255–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Weinberger F. Pathogen-induced defence and innate immunity in macroalgae. Biol Bull. 2007;213(3):290–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Xu T, Su Y, Xu Y, He Y, Wang B, Dong X, Li Y, Zhang XH. Mutations of flagellar genes fliC12, fliA and flhDC of Edwardsiella tarda attenuated bacterial motility, biofilm formation and virulence to fish. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;116(2):236–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yao J, Allen C. Chemotaxis is required for virulence and competitive fitness of the bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(10):3697–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Zoued A, Brunet YR, Durand E, Aschtgen MS, Logger L, Douzi B, Journet L, Cambillau C, Cascales E. Architeture and assembly of the type VI secretion system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843(8):1664–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Bernd Kopke is acknowledged for help with HPCL/MS.

Funding

This work was supported by the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre ‘Roseobacter’ (Transregio TRR 51) funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Centre for Marine Bio-Innovation, UNSW Sydney and the Australian Research Council (ARC grant FT130100828).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sven Breider and Shama Sehar contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology of Geological Processes - Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Sven Breider, Martine Berger & Thorsten Brinkhoff

  2. Centre for Marine Science and Innovation (CMSI), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Shama Sehar, Torsten Thomas & Suhelen Egan

Authors
  1. Sven Breider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shama Sehar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martine Berger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Torsten Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Thorsten Brinkhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Suhelen Egan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SB did the indigoidine extraction and analysis and draft of manuscript. SS did the comparative analysis; biofilm formation assay; draft of manuscript. MB did the siderophore CAS test. TT did the assembly and annotation. TB and SE supervised the study. All authors discussed, revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suhelen Egan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Table S1 Classification and general features of Epibacterium ulvae U95 T in accordance with the MIGS recommendations [22] published by the Genome Standards Consortium [23]. Table S2 Project information. Table S3 Gene comparisons of putative indigoidine biosynthesis clusters. Table S4 Gene clusters encoding proteins for chemotaxis-related methyl accepting proteins E. ulvae U95 T. Table S5 Gene clusters encoding proteins and extracellular s tructures for surface in E. ulvae U95 T. Table S6 Resistance proteins and transporters present in genome of Epibacterium ulvae U95 that provide protection against competing microorganisms. Drug resistance proteins and efflux pumps. Table S7. Resistance proteins and transporters present in genome of Epibacterium ulvae U95 that provide protection against competing microorganisms. DMT Transporter. Table S8 Protein secretory systems present in Epibacterium ulvae U95. Figure S1. Chrome Azurol S (CAS) assay for the determination of siderophore production. The strains were grown on iron depleted medium and the sterile filtrated supernatant of E. ulvae U95 T and R. denitrificans (R.d.) were used for the CAS assay. Deferoxamine mesylate (50 μM) used as positive control (+) and the iron depleted medium as negative control (−). Figure S2. Biofilm forming ability of different isolates under study. Error bars represents standard deviations from multiple cultures (n = 10). Figure S3. Above: PDA-chromatogram at 610 nm; below: MS mass chromatogram at m/z 249. (PDF 1182 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breider, S., Sehar, S., Berger, M. et al. Genome sequence of Epibacterium ulvae strain DSM 24752T, an indigoidine-producing, macroalga-associated member of the marine Roseobacter group. Environmental Microbiome 14, 4 (2019). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40793-019-0343-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40793-019-0343-5

Keywords

Environmental Microbiome

ISSN: 2524-6372